Hengst SE und Co. KG
37 Employer Review(s)
Colleagues:
Supervisor:
Tasks:
Salary:
Career:
OVERALL:
Location
#
Country
Date
Rating
Review
Germany 1
27.03.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 2
22.12.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 3
20.11.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 4
12.10.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 5
11.04.2014
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Recommendable workplace.
Germany 6
19.01.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 7
20.12.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 8
16.11.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 9
21.11.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 10
14.12.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Münster 11
08.12.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Münster 12
31.07.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Münster 13
04.02.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Münster 14
13.06.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent work atmosphere. Good Management. Excellent activity. High payments. Good future prospects. Excellent employer.
Münster 15
21.10.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Employers with criticisms.
Münster 16
21.10.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Münster 17
21.10.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Münster 18
11.03.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Münster 19
23.06.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Münster 20
25.05.2008
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Satisfactory employment site.
Münster 21
14.05.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Satisfactory employment site.
Münster 22
21.12.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Satisfactory employment site.
Münster 23
07.02.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Münster 24
18.02.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Useful management. Interesting tasks. Demotivating income. Rare upgrades. Reasonable job provider.
Münster 25
16.09.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Useful management. Acceptable service. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Münster 26
26.10.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. Filling employment. Demotivating income. Average recognition. Reasonable job provider.
Münster 27
03.12.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Useful management. Filling employment. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Employers with criticisms.
Münster 28
15.12.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Münster 29
09.01.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Satisfactory staff work. Acceptable service. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Reasonable job provider.
Münster 30
04.03.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Reasonable job provider.
Münster 31
15.07.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent work atmosphere. Need to improve personnel management. Filling employment. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Employers with criticisms.
Münster 32
07.10.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Münster 33
17.03.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Satisfactory staff work. Below-average salary. Beneficial career. Recommendable workplace.
Münster 34
03.10.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Employers with criticisms.
Münster 35
02.08.2014
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Mere Work carried out. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Münster 36
21.09.2014
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Employers with criticisms.
Münster 37
27.11.2020
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
